2025-06-23
We often talk about AI replacing jobs. But many jobs have already been replaced, only the human remains.
Receptionists, support agents, schedulers, administrators. Much of their work has been standardized, templated, protocolized. The systems are already in place. The people simply speak for them.
So when AI arrives and takes over the remaining tasks, we say: "See? It can do it without the human." But that conclusion hides a deeper truth: we’ve been operating without true human agency for a while now.
Humans reduced to interfaces. Workers becoming protocol executors. Meaning slowly drained from the role, until all that’s left is function.
AI didn’t start that. It just exposed it.
Instead of asking what can be automated, we should ask: what’s worth preserving?
Maybe this is the moment to bring people back to the core of their work, to emphasize judgement, emotion, nuance. The very things AI still lacks.
Let AI handle the repeatable, the rote. But let humans lead when things get messy, subtle, human.
To do that, we need systems that respect our need for understanding.
It’s a visual backend platform. You build logic as nodes. You connect systems. You define when the human should step in, and when automation makes sense.
It’s not built to replace people. It’s built to let people choose what they give away.
Automation isn’t the problem.
Losing the ability to decide, that’s the real threat.